After viewing "Architecture: The Science of Design", I learned special that data and information on architecture through tests tells architects whether they should plants trees around the base of a skyscraper or tall building, or make the foundation wider. This testing can be used to predict other possible occurrences such as snow accumulation on roof tops, or even the quality of air at higher elevations. Testing can verify the safest predictions for buildings so that they are in appropriate locations according to weather or environment. "Smart apartments", though expensive are used to save energy and cut back costs of living. They are also efficient for people with disabilities and the elderly. Concrete was used as early as Greek and Roman times, and is found in all forms of architecture.
"I.M. Pei and the Mathematics of Architecture" explained that architecture and structure are one discipline, not separate. If architects are not aware of the forces of structure, then designs may not be successful. Geometry is one of the driving forces of design, as well as light, space, and many more elements. What makes a tall building unique is its function, and whether it is able to resist earthquakes, wind, and any kind of weather; they are challenges that require successful solutions. Form can follow structure, and this was Pei's way of geometry. Architecture and sculpture are indeed related, but function stands in the way to prevent architecture from becoming sculpture.
The videos relate to the text in the fact that they go over most of the same ideas the text explained about architecture, and how it relies on the environment whether it's successful or not, and more energy efficient architecture should be encouraged for the sake of cost effectiveness and the safety of our environment. They discussed the same themes relaying to building styles, and popular, yet strong building materials. The one thing the videos and text shared, but the videos were more successful at was making the material more interesting by showing it visually. I am a visual learner, more so than by literature, so seeing every thing in the videos that was discussed in the book was more enticing to me. I liked hearing the stories, histories and details behind the straight facts. I understood architecture more though the way the information was shown. I was able to see (digitally) what a foundation looked like, or what happens to the entire structure of a building when weather wears away at it.
The video I chose out of the four was the one featuring I.M. Pei, and I chose it because I had heard about the architect before, and was interested in his background. I thoroughly ended up enjoying the video, and even found myself laughing at Pei, for I found him delightful. With a constant smile, and those black round eyeglass frames, he made the entire video irresistible. I found it amazing that a man who created such wonders around the world was as humble as he was. He didn't seem too proud or arrogant, but more surprised at himself that he could create such buildings. I can HONESTLY say I truly enjoyed viewing his background, and designs. I especially liked hearing about the building in Boston and the windows blowing out close to when it was finished. Pei seemed to laugh it off as he was telling the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment